Vereev

Louis Vuitton reference

Louis Vuitton Date Codes: Formats, Meaning, and Limits

Understand Louis Vuitton date-code formats from the 1980s to 2021, how month and week codes work, where to look, factory-code limits, and why codes do not prove authenticity.

By VereevSource-reviewed by VereevUpdated July 28, 20269 min read
Vereev authentication specialist examining a luxury handbag

Quick answer

A Louis Vuitton date code is a production reference, not a unique serial number. Early codes used numbers for year and month; 1990–2006 codes commonly used two factory characters plus four month/year digits; 2007–early 2021 codes used the same shape but encoded week/year. Visible codes were phased out around 2021.

Date codes are useful when they are treated as chronology. They can help test whether an item's claimed production period and country details are plausible, but they cannot prove who made the item. Counterfeit products can reproduce valid code patterns.

What a Louis Vuitton date code means

The numeric portion records a production period according to the format used at the time. Later codes also include a facility reference commonly associated with one or more manufacturing countries. Multiple genuine items can share the same code because the code is not an individual identity number.

Use the date as a cross-check. Ask whether the model, material, interior, hardware, and country stamp are consistent with that period. If the chronology works, the item still needs a full review; if it does not work, recheck the code and product history before drawing a conclusion.

Date-code formats by production era

Before the early 1980s, many items had no date code. Early-1980s examples commonly use three or four digits: the first two represent the year and the remaining digit or digits represent the month. Mid-to-late-1980s examples commonly add two facility characters after the numeric date.

From 1990 through 2006, the first and third digits of the four-digit portion indicate the month and the second and fourth indicate the year. From 2007 into early 2021, the first and third indicate the production week while the second and fourth still indicate the year.

  • 844 is commonly read as April 1984.
  • 882 VI is commonly read as February 1988 with facility code VI.
  • SP0065 is commonly read as June 2005.
  • SR3179 is commonly read as week 37 of 2019.

Where to find a date code

Placement changes by product and era. A code may be stamped on a small leather tab, directly on lining material, inside a pocket, near a seam, or within a bill compartment on small leather goods. Wear, dark interiors, and repairs can make a genuine code difficult to see.

Use a flashlight and photograph the area without pulling hard on a seam or cutting the lining. If the code is faint, capture several angles with side lighting. Do not trace over the stamp or edit the image in a way that changes the character shapes.

Why factory-code tables disagree

Published factory lists are secondary references, not a public Louis Vuitton database. Some codes are associated with more than one country, facilities and records change over time, and online tables may be incomplete or copied from older sources.

Treat a country result as a likely association. Compare it with the item's visible country stamp and production period, and investigate contradictions. A matching pair of codes still does not establish authenticity.

What changed around 2021

Established resale references report that Louis Vuitton phased out standard visible date codes around 2021 and moved to embedded chips used for internal product information. Consumers should not expect a public chip-lookup database or assume that a phone's ordinary NFC scan will authenticate a bag.

For a newer item, no visible code may be normal. Review the exact model and purchase period, and do not damage the item searching for a component that is not intended to be publicly read.

How to use a decoder responsibly

A decoder should identify the likely era, reject impossible months or weeks, and explain uncertainty. It should not output “authentic” or “fake.” If the format is plausible, continue with the rest of the item. If it is invalid, recheck ambiguous characters, placement, and the claimed era before treating the result as evidence.

Sources and evidence

How this guide was researched

Vereev separates official brand information, established secondary references, first-party product information, and general buyer-safety guidance. Sources support context, not an authenticity verdict for an unseen item.

Read the full Vereev research methodology or request a correction.

Item-level review

Authenticate with Vereev

Use the guide to collect clear evidence, then submit the exact item through Vereev when you need an authentication result and digital certificate.

Vereev is an independent authentication service and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Louis Vuitton. Educational guidance cannot replace an item-level review.